STEM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fluence Energy has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 3.9%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.87, signalling upside risk potential of 124.9%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $26.77 which suggests that it could grow by 56.64%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 127.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.52x versus 0.89x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Vault Holdings has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of -2217.93%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.87, signalling upside risk potential of 124.9%. On the other hand Energy Vault Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.54 which suggests that it could fall by -2.97%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Vault Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Vault Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are larger than Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Vault Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.52x versus 2.48x for Energy Vault Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ormat Technologies has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 10.43%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Ormat Technologies's return on equity of 4.79%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.87, signalling upside risk potential of 124.9%. On the other hand Ormat Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24.16%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Ormat Technologies, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Ormat Technologies.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ormat Technologies has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.89%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ormat Technologies offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies pays out 22.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Ormat Technologies quarterly revenues of $211.8M. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Ormat Technologies's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ormat Technologies's PE ratio is 34.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.52x versus 4.67x for Ormat Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 30.27%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.87, signalling upside risk potential of 124.9%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $255.56 which suggests that it could grow by 18.54%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.52x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.