STC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First American Financial has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of -7.4%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 4.31% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 1.92%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $83.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.08%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.20 which suggests that it could grow by 25.91%. Given that Stewart Information Services has higher upside potential than First American Financial, analysts believe Stewart Information Services is more attractive than First American Financial.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.107%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 165.98% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 99.91% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stewart Information Services's is not.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are smaller than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Stewart Information Services's net income of $30.1M is higher than First American Financial's net income of -$104M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.33x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 68.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.75x versus 1.07x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity National Financial has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 7.56%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 4.31% beat Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 9.69%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $83.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.08%. On the other hand Fidelity National Financial has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.82%. Given that Stewart Information Services has higher upside potential than Fidelity National Financial, analysts believe Stewart Information Services is more attractive than Fidelity National Financial.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.668%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Fidelity National Financial offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 165.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Financial pays out 96.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity National Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stewart Information Services's is not.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are smaller than Fidelity National Financial quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Stewart Information Services's net income of $30.1M is lower than Fidelity National Financial's net income of $266M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.33x while Fidelity National Financial's PE ratio is 20.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.75x versus 1.16x for Fidelity National Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Investors Title has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 13.53%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 4.31% beat Investors Title's return on equity of 11.05%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $83.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.08%. On the other hand Investors Title has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Stewart Information Services has higher upside potential than Investors Title, analysts believe Stewart Information Services is more attractive than Investors Title.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Investors Title has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.159%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Investors Title offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $14.46 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 165.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Investors Title pays out 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Investors Title's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stewart Information Services's is not.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are larger than Investors Title quarterly revenues of $68.8M. Stewart Information Services's net income of $30.1M is higher than Investors Title's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.33x while Investors Title's PE ratio is 15.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.75x versus 1.79x for Investors Title. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HG Holdings has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Stewart Information Services's net margin of 5.36%. Stewart Information Services's return on equity of 4.31% beat HG Holdings's return on equity of -1.31%.

Stewart Information Services has a consensus price target of $83.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.08%. On the other hand HG Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 345.36%. Given that HG Holdings has higher upside potential than Stewart Information Services, analysts believe HG Holdings is more attractive than Stewart Information Services.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 24.035% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HG Holdings has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.46%.

Stewart Information Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. HG Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stewart Information Services pays 165.98% of its earnings as a dividend. HG Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stewart Information Services quarterly revenues are $667.9M, which are larger than HG Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Stewart Information Services's net income of $30.1M is higher than HG Holdings's net income of $170K. Notably, Stewart Information Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.33x while HG Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stewart Information Services is 0.75x versus 1.11x for HG Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.