SNDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Shared Hospital Services has a net margin of -5.99% compared to Sonida Senior Living's net margin of -2.96%. Sonida Senior Living's return on equity of -4.58% beat American Shared Hospital Services's return on equity of 13.75%.

Sonida Senior Living has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.49%. On the other hand American Shared Hospital Services has an analysts' consensus of $4.84 which suggests that it could grow by 80.6%. Given that American Shared Hospital Services has higher upside potential than Sonida Senior Living, analysts believe American Shared Hospital Services is more attractive than Sonida Senior Living.

Sonida Senior Living has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.264% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Shared Hospital Services has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.359%.

Sonida Senior Living has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Shared Hospital Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonida Senior Living pays -136.86% of its earnings as a dividend. American Shared Hospital Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonida Senior Living quarterly revenues are $91.9M, which are larger than American Shared Hospital Services quarterly revenues of $7M. Sonida Senior Living's net income of -$5.5M is lower than American Shared Hospital Services's net income of -$207K. Notably, Sonida Senior Living's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Shared Hospital Services's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living is 1.11x versus 0.64x for American Shared Hospital Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cryo-Cell International has a net margin of -5.99% compared to Sonida Senior Living's net margin of 3.55%. Sonida Senior Living's return on equity of -4.58% beat Cryo-Cell International's return on equity of --.

Sonida Senior Living has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.49%. On the other hand Cryo-Cell International has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 74.21%. Given that Cryo-Cell International has higher upside potential than Sonida Senior Living, analysts believe Cryo-Cell International is more attractive than Sonida Senior Living.

Sonida Senior Living has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.264% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cryo-Cell International has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.595%.

Sonida Senior Living has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cryo-Cell International offers a yield of 10.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Sonida Senior Living pays -136.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cryo-Cell International pays out 502.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonida Senior Living quarterly revenues are $91.9M, which are larger than Cryo-Cell International quarterly revenues of $8M. Sonida Senior Living's net income of -$5.5M is lower than Cryo-Cell International's net income of $282.9K. Notably, Sonida Senior Living's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cryo-Cell International's PE ratio is 487.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living is 1.11x versus 1.24x for Cryo-Cell International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnovAge Holding has a net margin of -5.99% compared to Sonida Senior Living's net margin of -6.33%. Sonida Senior Living's return on equity of -4.58% beat InnovAge Holding's return on equity of -8.76%.

Sonida Senior Living has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.49%. On the other hand InnovAge Holding has an analysts' consensus of $5.25 which suggests that it could grow by 81.66%. Given that InnovAge Holding has higher upside potential than Sonida Senior Living, analysts believe InnovAge Holding is more attractive than Sonida Senior Living.

Sonida Senior Living has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.264% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnovAge Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sonida Senior Living has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. InnovAge Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sonida Senior Living pays -136.86% of its earnings as a dividend. InnovAge Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sonida Senior Living quarterly revenues are $91.9M, which are smaller than InnovAge Holding quarterly revenues of $209M. Sonida Senior Living's net income of -$5.5M is higher than InnovAge Holding's net income of -$13.2M. Notably, Sonida Senior Living's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnovAge Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living is 1.11x versus 0.49x for InnovAge Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Healthcare has a net margin of -5.99% compared to Sonida Senior Living's net margin of 1.65%. Sonida Senior Living's return on equity of -4.58% beat National Healthcare's return on equity of 10.72%.

Sonida Senior Living has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.49%. On the other hand National Healthcare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sonida Senior Living has higher upside potential than National Healthcare, analysts believe Sonida Senior Living is more attractive than National Healthcare.

Sonida Senior Living has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.264% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Healthcare has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.765%.

Sonida Senior Living has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Healthcare offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Sonida Senior Living pays -136.86% of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. National Healthcare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sonida Senior Living quarterly revenues are $91.9M, which are smaller than National Healthcare quarterly revenues of $369.4M. Sonida Senior Living's net income of -$5.5M is lower than National Healthcare's net income of $6.1M. Notably, Sonida Senior Living's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National Healthcare's PE ratio is 14.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sonida Senior Living is 1.11x versus 1.13x for National Healthcare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.