SBSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Fields has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -79.72% beat Gold Fields's return on equity of 13.75%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.22, signalling upside risk potential of 42.53%. On the other hand Gold Fields has an analysts' consensus of $18.76 which suggests that it could grow by 22.7%. Given that Sibanye Stillwater has higher upside potential than Gold Fields, analysts believe Sibanye Stillwater is more attractive than Gold Fields.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Fields has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.907%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Fields offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Fields pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Fields quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Gold Fields's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Fields's PE ratio is 19.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.43x versus 3.14x for Gold Fields. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmony Gold Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -79.72% beat Harmony Gold Mining's return on equity of 22.28%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.22, signalling upside risk potential of 42.53%. On the other hand Harmony Gold Mining has an analysts' consensus of $9.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.14%. Given that Sibanye Stillwater has higher upside potential than Harmony Gold Mining, analysts believe Sibanye Stillwater is more attractive than Harmony Gold Mining.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmony Gold Mining has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.599%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmony Gold Mining offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining pays out 16.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmony Gold Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harmony Gold Mining quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Harmony Gold Mining's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmony Gold Mining's PE ratio is 11.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.43x versus 1.87x for Harmony Gold Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPC has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -79.72% beat PPC's return on equity of 5.04%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.22, signalling upside risk potential of 42.53%. On the other hand PPC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sibanye Stillwater has higher upside potential than PPC, analysts believe Sibanye Stillwater is more attractive than PPC.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPC has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.792%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PPC offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PPC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PPC quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than PPC's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PPC's PE ratio is 15.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.43x versus 0.58x for PPC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sasol has a net margin of -- compared to Sibanye Stillwater's net margin of --. Sibanye Stillwater's return on equity of -79.72% beat Sasol's return on equity of --.

Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $5.22, signalling upside risk potential of 42.53%. On the other hand Sasol has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.67%. Given that Sasol has higher upside potential than Sibanye Stillwater, analysts believe Sasol is more attractive than Sibanye Stillwater.

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.555, which suggesting that the stock is 55.541% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sasol has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.147%.

Sibanye Stillwater has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sasol offers a yield of 11.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Sibanye Stillwater pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sasol pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sibanye Stillwater quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sasol quarterly revenues of --. Sibanye Stillwater's net income of -- is lower than Sasol's net income of --. Notably, Sibanye Stillwater's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sasol's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sibanye Stillwater is 0.43x versus 0.18x for Sasol. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.