RNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sabre has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 4.55%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Sabre's return on equity of --.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 28.4%. On the other hand Sabre has an analysts' consensus of $4.58 which suggests that it could grow by 74.08%. Given that Sabre has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Sabre is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabre has a beta of 1.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.1%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabre offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sabre pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are smaller than Sabre quarterly revenues of $776.6M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Sabre's net income of $35.3M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabre's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 0.35x for Sabre. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 1.71%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 28.4%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $129.74 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that RingCentral has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe RingCentral is more attractive than Twilio.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.482%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 3.99x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -2.12%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 28.4%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 148.34%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 0.20x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -8.17%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $33.38, signalling upside risk potential of 28.4%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 108.33%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 26.969% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 2.22x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.