QTWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bandwidth has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -0.84%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Bandwidth's return on equity of -2.1%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $103.86, signalling upside risk potential of 38.98%. On the other hand Bandwidth has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 81.07%. Given that Bandwidth has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Bandwidth is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bandwidth has a beta of 1.889, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.876%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bandwidth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bandwidth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are smaller than Bandwidth quarterly revenues of $210M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is higher than Bandwidth's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bandwidth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.45x versus 0.46x for Bandwidth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BlackLine has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 33.29%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat BlackLine's return on equity of 43.72%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $103.86, signalling upside risk potential of 38.98%. On the other hand BlackLine has an analysts' consensus of $61.91 which suggests that it could grow by 35.8%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than BlackLine, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than BlackLine.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackLine has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.528%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackLine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackLine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are larger than BlackLine quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is lower than BlackLine's net income of $56.4M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackLine's PE ratio is 31.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.45x versus 5.13x for BlackLine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -13.16%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Ncino's return on equity of -3.51%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $103.86, signalling upside risk potential of 38.98%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $26.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Ncino.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $141.4M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is higher than Ncino's net income of -$18.6M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.45x versus 5.08x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rapid7 has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -0.69%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -8.01% beat Rapid7's return on equity of --.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $103.86, signalling upside risk potential of 38.98%. On the other hand Rapid7 has an analysts' consensus of $37.56 which suggests that it could grow by 59.34%. Given that Rapid7 has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Rapid7 is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.611, which suggesting that the stock is 61.13% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapid7 has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.003%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rapid7 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rapid7 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $183M, which are smaller than Rapid7 quarterly revenues of $216.3M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $164K is higher than Rapid7's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rapid7's PE ratio is 60.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 6.45x versus 2.00x for Rapid7. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.