QS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoZone has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 13.2%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat AutoZone's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand AutoZone has an analysts' consensus of $3,610.22 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that AutoZone has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe AutoZone is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoZone has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.008%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoZone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoZone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AutoZone quarterly revenues of $4.3B. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than AutoZone's net income of $564.9M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AutoZone's PE ratio is 22.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 3.12x for AutoZone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuvve Holding has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -91.19%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat Nuvve Holding's return on equity of -330.26%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand Nuvve Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26355.03%. Given that Nuvve Holding has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe Nuvve Holding is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuvve Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuvve Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuvve Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuvve Holding quarterly revenues of $1.8M. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than Nuvve Holding's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuvve Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.37x for Nuvve Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 15.25%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $1,263.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.06%. Given that O'Reilly Automotive has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe O'Reilly Automotive is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.198%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.4B. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $665.5M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 29.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 4.35x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarParts.com has a net margin of -- compared to QuantumScape's net margin of -6.92%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -- beat CarParts.com's return on equity of -28.91%.

QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $6.20, signalling downside risk potential of -6.62%. On the other hand CarParts.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.61%. Given that CarParts.com has higher upside potential than QuantumScape, analysts believe CarParts.com is more attractive than QuantumScape.

QuantumScape has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarParts.com has a beta of 2.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.196%.

QuantumScape has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarParts.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuantumScape pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarParts.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuantumScape quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CarParts.com quarterly revenues of $144.8M. QuantumScape's net income of -$119.6M is lower than CarParts.com's net income of -$10M. Notably, QuantumScape's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CarParts.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuantumScape is -- versus 0.09x for CarParts.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.