QD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -131.8% compared to Qudian's net margin of 8.45%. Qudian's return on equity of 0.35% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 7.49%.

Qudian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.23%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.12 which suggests that it could fall by -29%. Given that Qudian has more downside risk than LexinFintech Holdings, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Qudian.

Qudian has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.888%.

Qudian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Qudian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $511.5M. Qudian's net income of $18.4M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $43.2M. Notably, Qudian's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.06x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 9.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian is 17.22x versus 0.50x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of -131.8% compared to Qudian's net margin of --. Qudian's return on equity of 0.35% beat The9's return on equity of --.

Qudian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.23%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Qudian has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Qudian is more attractive than The9.

Qudian has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.461%.

Qudian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qudian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Qudian's net income of $18.4M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Qudian's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.06x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian is 17.22x versus 2.55x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qifu Technology has a net margin of -131.8% compared to Qudian's net margin of 50.31%. Qudian's return on equity of 0.35% beat Qifu Technology's return on equity of 24.56%.

Qudian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.23%. On the other hand Qifu Technology has an analysts' consensus of $43.12 which suggests that it could grow by 16.87%. Given that Qifu Technology has higher upside potential than Qudian, analysts believe Qifu Technology is more attractive than Qudian.

Qudian has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qifu Technology has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.071%.

Qudian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Qifu Technology offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Qudian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology pays out 21.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Qifu Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Qudian quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Qifu Technology quarterly revenues of $500.5M. Qudian's net income of $18.4M is lower than Qifu Technology's net income of $251.8M. Notably, Qudian's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.06x while Qifu Technology's PE ratio is 7.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian is 17.22x versus 2.96x for Qifu Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UP Fintech Holding has a net margin of -131.8% compared to Qudian's net margin of 17.57%. Qudian's return on equity of 0.35% beat UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 6.09%.

Qudian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -61.23%. On the other hand UP Fintech Holding has an analysts' consensus of $8.03 which suggests that it could grow by 21.12%. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Qudian, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Qudian.

Qudian has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.894%.

Qudian has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UP Fintech Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Qudian pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UP Fintech Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Qudian quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues of $101.1M. Qudian's net income of $18.4M is higher than UP Fintech Holding's net income of $17.8M. Notably, Qudian's price-to-earnings ratio is 68.06x while UP Fintech Holding's PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Qudian is 17.22x versus 3.17x for UP Fintech Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.