PSTL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Postal Realty Trust's net margin of 15.94%. Postal Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.13% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Postal Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $15.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Postal Realty Trust has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Postal Realty Trust is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Postal Realty Trust has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.691%.

Postal Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Postal Realty Trust pays 424.3% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Postal Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $21.4M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Postal Realty Trust's net income of $4.5M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Postal Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.90x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 78.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Realty Trust is 3.78x versus 12.08x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Postal Realty Trust's net margin of 70.33%. Postal Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.13% beat Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96%.

Postal Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $15.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand Manhattan Bridge Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.33%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than Postal Realty Trust, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than Postal Realty Trust.

Postal Realty Trust has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.032%.

Postal Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. Manhattan Bridge Capital offers a yield of 9.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Postal Realty Trust pays 424.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays out 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Postal Realty Trust's is not.

Postal Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $21.4M, which are larger than Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Postal Realty Trust's net income of $4.5M is higher than Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Postal Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.90x while Manhattan Bridge Capital's PE ratio is 9.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Realty Trust is 3.78x versus 7.53x for Manhattan Bridge Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Postal Realty Trust's net margin of 25.03%. Postal Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.13% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Postal Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $15.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that Postal Realty Trust has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Postal Realty Trust is more attractive than SBA Communications.

Postal Realty Trust has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

Postal Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Postal Realty Trust pays 424.3% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Postal Realty Trust's is not.

Postal Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $21.4M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. Postal Realty Trust's net income of $4.5M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, Postal Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.90x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 31.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Realty Trust is 3.78x versus 8.84x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 21.07% compared to Postal Realty Trust's net margin of -0.24%. Postal Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.13% beat Xenia Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 1.24%.

Postal Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $15.72, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand Xenia Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $13.17 which suggests that it could grow by 34.49%. Given that Xenia Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Postal Realty Trust, analysts believe Xenia Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Postal Realty Trust.

Postal Realty Trust has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.496% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xenia Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.384, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.447%.

Postal Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. Xenia Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Postal Realty Trust pays 424.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Xenia Hotels & Resorts pays out 296.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Postal Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $21.4M, which are smaller than Xenia Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $261.8M. Postal Realty Trust's net income of $4.5M is higher than Xenia Hotels & Resorts's net income of -$638K. Notably, Postal Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.90x while Xenia Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 65.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Postal Realty Trust is 3.78x versus 0.96x for Xenia Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.