NOAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of 24.24% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of 13.86%. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 4.88% beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.81, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 61.05%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Noah Holdings, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Noah Holdings.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.169%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.51%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Noah Holdings pays 211.98% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Noah Holdings's is not.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $84.5M, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. Noah Holdings's net income of $20.5M is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 2.46x versus 0.63x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The9 has a net margin of 24.24% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of --. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 4.88% beat The9's return on equity of --.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.81, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand The9 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than The9, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than The9.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The9 has a beta of 1.820, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.998%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.51%. The9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 211.98% of its earnings as a dividend. The9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $84.5M, which are larger than The9 quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings's net income of $20.5M is higher than The9's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while The9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 2.46x versus 2.41x for The9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 24.24% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of --. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 4.88% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.81, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Noah Holdings has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.557%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.51%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Noah Holdings pays 211.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $84.5M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Noah Holdings's net income of $20.5M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 2.46x versus 2.91x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yiren Digital has a net margin of 24.24% compared to Noah Holdings's net margin of 15.92%. Noah Holdings's return on equity of 4.88% beat Yiren Digital's return on equity of 14.55%.

Noah Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.81, signalling downside risk potential of -4.83%. On the other hand Yiren Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -68.08%. Given that Yiren Digital has more downside risk than Noah Holdings, analysts believe Noah Holdings is more attractive than Yiren Digital.

Noah Holdings has a beta of 0.843, which suggesting that the stock is 15.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yiren Digital has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.415%.

Noah Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.51%. Yiren Digital offers a yield of 6.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Noah Holdings pays 211.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Yiren Digital pays out 7.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Yiren Digital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Noah Holdings's is not.

Noah Holdings quarterly revenues are $84.5M, which are smaller than Yiren Digital quarterly revenues of $213.7M. Noah Holdings's net income of $20.5M is lower than Yiren Digital's net income of $34M. Notably, Noah Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Yiren Digital's PE ratio is 2.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Noah Holdings is 2.46x versus 0.64x for Yiren Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.