NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archrock has a net margin of -6.25% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 18.31%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Archrock's return on equity of 16.37%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.25, signalling upside risk potential of 51.98%. On the other hand Archrock has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.19%. Given that Nine Energy Service has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe Nine Energy Service is more attractive than Archrock.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.72% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archrock has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.785%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Archrock offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock pays out 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are smaller than Archrock quarterly revenues of $326.4M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Archrock's net income of $59.8M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Archrock's PE ratio is 21.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 3.13x for Archrock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of -6.25% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 16.73%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.25, signalling upside risk potential of 51.98%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that Nine Energy Service has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Nine Energy Service is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.72% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 22.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 3.79x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kosmos Energy has a net margin of -6.25% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of -1.66%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 16.82%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.25, signalling upside risk potential of 51.98%. On the other hand Kosmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 210.71%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.72% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kosmos Energy has a beta of 1.937, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.697%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kosmos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are smaller than Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M is lower than Kosmos Energy's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kosmos Energy's PE ratio is 4.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 0.46x for Kosmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of -6.25% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of --. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.25, signalling upside risk potential of 51.98%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 65.21%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.72% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $141.4M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$8.8M is lower than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.