NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flotek Industries has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 5.09%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 7.85%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.2%. Given that Flotek Industries has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Flotek Industries is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, which suggesting that the stock is 257.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.931%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $49.7M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Flotek Industries's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 30.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 1.36x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kosmos Energy has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of -1.66%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 16.82%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Kosmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $5.89 which suggests that it could grow by 111.02%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, which suggesting that the stock is 257.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.596%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kosmos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are smaller than Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Kosmos Energy's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kosmos Energy's PE ratio is 7.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 0.80x for Kosmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 7.86%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 22.05%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $27.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.85%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, which suggesting that the stock is 257.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.051%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $713.5M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Oceaneering International's net income of $56.1M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 15.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 0.85x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Sand has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of -0.16%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Smart Sand's return on equity of -2.27%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling downside risk potential of -8.26%. On the other hand Smart Sand has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.62%. Given that Smart Sand has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Smart Sand is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.577, which suggesting that the stock is 257.676% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Sand has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.82%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Sand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Sand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Smart Sand quarterly revenues of $63.2M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Smart Sand's net income of -$98K. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smart Sand's PE ratio is 54.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 0.30x for Smart Sand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.