NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flotek Industries has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 5.09%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 7.85%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.96%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.91%. Given that Flotek Industries has more downside risk than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Nine Energy Service is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.698%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $49.7M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Flotek Industries's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 37.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 1.64x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 37.36%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.81%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.96%. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that MPLX LP has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe MPLX LP is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.634%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are smaller than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1B. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 4.48x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 6.07%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 21.26%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.96%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $27.60 which suggests that it could grow by 9.52%. Given that Oceaneering International has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 2.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.182%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are smaller than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $679.8M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Oceaneering International's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 19.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 0.99x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Sand has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of -0.16%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Smart Sand's return on equity of -2.27%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.96%. On the other hand Smart Sand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.19%. Given that Smart Sand has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Smart Sand is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Sand has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.742%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Sand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Sand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Smart Sand quarterly revenues of $63.2M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Smart Sand's net income of -$98K. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smart Sand's PE ratio is 52.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.07x versus 0.29x for Smart Sand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.