MSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlueLinx Holdings has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 0.74%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31% beat BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 8.19%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.23%. On the other hand BlueLinx Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $123.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.91%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.824, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.413%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. BlueLinx Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. BlueLinx Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $891.7M, which are larger than BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues of $710.6M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M is higher than BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $5.3M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.50x while BlueLinx Holdings's PE ratio is 11.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.16x versus 0.21x for BlueLinx Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of -5.4%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of -1.11%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.23%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.91%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.247%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $891.7M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $480.5M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M is higher than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of -$25.9M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.50x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,525.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.16x versus 0.71x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 4.54%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 17.93%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.23%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.03%. Given that DXP Enterprises has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe DXP Enterprises is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.106%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $891.7M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $470.9M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $21.4M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.50x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 18.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.16x versus 0.73x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of 4.41% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 3.53%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31% beat Transcat's return on equity of 6.75%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.23%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $100.15 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, which suggesting that the stock is 10.556% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.183%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.35%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $891.7M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $66.8M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M is higher than Transcat's net income of $2.4M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.50x while Transcat's PE ratio is 43.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.16x versus 2.75x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.