LZB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ethan Allen Interiors has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 9.54%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Ethan Allen Interiors's return on equity of 12.82%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.89%. On the other hand Ethan Allen Interiors has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.78%. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Ethan Allen Interiors, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Ethan Allen Interiors.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.405%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Ethan Allen Interiors offers a yield of 5.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Ethan Allen Interiors pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Ethan Allen Interiors quarterly revenues of $157.3M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Ethan Allen Interiors's net income of $15M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Ethan Allen Interiors's PE ratio is 11.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 1.10x for Ethan Allen Interiors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 8.35%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 13.18%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.89%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.3%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.3%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $108.5M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $9.1M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 0.51x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hooker Furnishings has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -3.96%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.89%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.34%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than La-Z-Boy.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.417%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Hooker Furnishings offers a yield of 7.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues of $104.4M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Hooker Furnishings's PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 0.33x for Hooker Furnishings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Lifestyle has a net margin of 5.45% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of -94.28%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 12.24% beat Nova Lifestyle's return on equity of -1289.9%.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $46.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.89%. On the other hand Nova Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that La-Z-Boy has higher upside potential than Nova Lifestyle, analysts believe La-Z-Boy is more attractive than Nova Lifestyle.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.645% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Lifestyle has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.

La-Z-Boy has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Nova Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. La-Z-Boy pays 26.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

La-Z-Boy quarterly revenues are $521.8M, which are larger than Nova Lifestyle quarterly revenues of $2.6M. La-Z-Boy's net income of $28.4M is higher than Nova Lifestyle's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, La-Z-Boy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.19x while Nova Lifestyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for La-Z-Boy is 0.78x versus 0.10x for Nova Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.