LVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Monarch Casino & Resort has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 20.02%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37% beat Monarch Casino & Resort's return on equity of 17.11%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $59.49, signalling upside risk potential of 15.83%. On the other hand Monarch Casino & Resort has an analysts' consensus of $77.80 which suggests that it could fall by -1.39%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Monarch Casino & Resort, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Monarch Casino & Resort.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monarch Casino & Resort has a beta of 1.740, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.027%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Monarch Casino & Resort offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Monarch Casino & Resort pays out 136.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Monarch Casino & Resort's is not.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Monarch Casino & Resort quarterly revenues of $137.9M. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M is higher than Monarch Casino & Resort's net income of $27.6M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while Monarch Casino & Resort's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 3.39x versus 2.95x for Monarch Casino & Resort. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGM Resorts International has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of 4.41%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37% beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 21.92%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $59.49, signalling upside risk potential of 15.83%. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $50.04 which suggests that it could grow by 44.42%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.04%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M is higher than MGM Resorts International's net income of $184.6M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 12.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 3.39x versus 0.64x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PENN Entertainment has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of -2.24%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37% beat PENN Entertainment's return on equity of -16.92%.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $59.49, signalling upside risk potential of 15.83%. On the other hand PENN Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $25.56 which suggests that it could grow by 16.94%. Given that PENN Entertainment has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe PENN Entertainment is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PENN Entertainment has a beta of 2.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.949%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. PENN Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. PENN Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than PENN Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M is higher than PENN Entertainment's net income of -$36.7M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while PENN Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 3.39x versus 0.48x for PENN Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wynn Resorts has a net margin of 10.25% compared to Las Vegas Sands's net margin of -1.89%. Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37% beat Wynn Resorts's return on equity of --.

Las Vegas Sands has a consensus price target of $59.49, signalling upside risk potential of 15.83%. On the other hand Wynn Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $115.73 which suggests that it could grow by 34.32%. Given that Wynn Resorts has higher upside potential than Las Vegas Sands, analysts believe Wynn Resorts is more attractive than Las Vegas Sands.

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.969%.

Las Vegas Sands has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.56%. Wynn Resorts offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Las Vegas Sands pays 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts pays out 11.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Wynn Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M is higher than Wynn Resorts's net income of -$32.1M. Notably, Las Vegas Sands's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while Wynn Resorts's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Las Vegas Sands is 3.39x versus 1.34x for Wynn Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.