JILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of 8.16% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -3.99%. J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -17.37%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $36.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Citi Trends.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 2.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.383%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $151.3M, which are smaller than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $179.1M. J.Jill's net income of $12.3M is higher than Citi Trends's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.66x versus 0.29x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Torrid Holdings has a net margin of 8.16% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -0.45%. J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54% beat Torrid Holdings's return on equity of --.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $36.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Torrid Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.20 which suggests that it could fall by -25.93%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Torrid Holdings, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Torrid Holdings.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Torrid Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Torrid Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Torrid Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $151.3M, which are smaller than Torrid Holdings quarterly revenues of $263.8M. J.Jill's net income of $12.3M is higher than Torrid Holdings's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Torrid Holdings's PE ratio is 37.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.66x versus 0.53x for Torrid Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 8.16% compared to J.Jill's net margin of 9.64%. J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 42.62%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $36.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $168.39 which suggests that it could grow by 11.1%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Ross Stores, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Ross Stores.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.503%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. J.Jill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 24.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $151.3M, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5.1B. J.Jill's net income of $12.3M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $488.8M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 23.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.66x versus 2.37x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of 8.16% compared to J.Jill's net margin of -4.16%. J.Jill's return on equity of 66.54% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 36.99%.

J.Jill has a consensus price target of $36.40, signalling upside risk potential of 30.5%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $44.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that J.Jill has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe J.Jill is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

J.Jill has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. J.Jill pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

J.Jill quarterly revenues are $151.3M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $1.3B. J.Jill's net income of $12.3M is higher than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$56M. Notably, J.Jill's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.64x while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for J.Jill is 0.66x versus 0.50x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.