INSW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorian LPG has a net margin of 27.03% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 10.66%. International Seaways's return on equity of 17.34% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity of 8.43%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $53.17, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Dorian LPG has an analysts' consensus of $31.25 which suggests that it could grow by 24.75%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Dorian LPG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Dorian LPG.

International Seaways has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.565%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Dorian LPG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorian LPG pays out 173.45% of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dorian LPG's is not.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $183.4M, which are larger than Dorian LPG quarterly revenues of $75.9M. International Seaways's net income of $49.6M is higher than Dorian LPG's net income of $8.1M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.17x while Dorian LPG's PE ratio is 11.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 2.31x versus 2.99x for Dorian LPG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plains All American Pipeline LP has a net margin of 27.03% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 3.69%. International Seaways's return on equity of 17.34% beat Plains All American Pipeline LP's return on equity of 7.11%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $53.17, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Plains All American Pipeline LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.86 which suggests that it could grow by 15.59%. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Plains All American Pipeline LP, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Plains All American Pipeline LP.

International Seaways has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains All American Pipeline LP has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.406%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Plains All American Pipeline LP offers a yield of 7.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains All American Pipeline LP pays out 148.32% of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Plains All American Pipeline LP's is not.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $183.4M, which are smaller than Plains All American Pipeline LP quarterly revenues of $12B. International Seaways's net income of $49.6M is lower than Plains All American Pipeline LP's net income of $443M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.17x while Plains All American Pipeline LP's PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 2.31x versus 0.25x for Plains All American Pipeline LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 27.03% compared to International Seaways's net margin of 84.53%. International Seaways's return on equity of 17.34% beat Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 12224.88%.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $53.17, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Permian Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

International Seaways has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.459%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Permian Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $183.4M, which are larger than Permian Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $3.1M. International Seaways's net income of $49.6M is higher than Permian Basin Royalty Trust's net income of $2.6M. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.17x while Permian Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 2.31x versus 22.67x for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan NRG has a net margin of 27.03% compared to International Seaways's net margin of --. International Seaways's return on equity of 17.34% beat Titan NRG's return on equity of --.

International Seaways has a consensus price target of $53.17, signalling upside risk potential of 33.22%. On the other hand Titan NRG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that International Seaways has higher upside potential than Titan NRG, analysts believe International Seaways is more attractive than Titan NRG.

International Seaways has a beta of 0.047, which suggesting that the stock is 95.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan NRG has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.257%.

International Seaways has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Titan NRG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. International Seaways pays 68.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan NRG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Seaways's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

International Seaways quarterly revenues are $183.4M, which are larger than Titan NRG quarterly revenues of --. International Seaways's net income of $49.6M is higher than Titan NRG's net income of --. Notably, International Seaways's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.17x while Titan NRG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for International Seaways is 2.31x versus 0.31x for Titan NRG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.