GSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Danaos has a net margin of 47.03% compared to Global Ship Lease's net margin of 48.01%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 26.03% beat Danaos's return on equity of 17.95%.

Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.15%. On the other hand Danaos has an analysts' consensus of $101.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.66%. Given that Global Ship Lease has higher upside potential than Danaos, analysts believe Global Ship Lease is more attractive than Danaos.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.547, which suggesting that the stock is 54.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danaos has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.735%.

Global Ship Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Danaos offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Global Ship Lease pays 20.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Danaos pays out 10.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease quarterly revenues are $172.5M, which are smaller than Danaos quarterly revenues of $256.2M. Global Ship Lease's net income of $81.1M is lower than Danaos's net income of $123M. Notably, Global Ship Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Danaos's PE ratio is 2.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease is 1.13x versus 1.55x for Danaos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Euroseas has a net margin of 47.03% compared to Global Ship Lease's net margin of 51.03%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 26.03% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 38.8%.

Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.15%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $59.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.41%. Given that Euroseas has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, analysts believe Euroseas is more attractive than Global Ship Lease.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.547, which suggesting that the stock is 54.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.112%.

Global Ship Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Euroseas offers a yield of 6.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Global Ship Lease pays 20.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease quarterly revenues are $172.5M, which are larger than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $54.1M. Global Ship Lease's net income of $81.1M is higher than Euroseas's net income of $27.6M. Notably, Global Ship Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease is 1.13x versus 1.18x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 47.03% compared to Global Ship Lease's net margin of 23.61%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 26.03% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.89%.

Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.15%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $26.44 which suggests that it could grow by 77.93%. Given that Star Bulk Carriers has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, analysts believe Star Bulk Carriers is more attractive than Global Ship Lease.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.547, which suggesting that the stock is 54.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.188%.

Global Ship Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 16.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Global Ship Lease pays 20.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 91.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Ship Lease quarterly revenues are $172.5M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $344.3M. Global Ship Lease's net income of $81.1M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $81.3M. Notably, Global Ship Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease is 1.13x versus 1.23x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a net margin of 47.03% compared to Global Ship Lease's net margin of 28.29%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 26.03% beat Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 19.6%.

Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $31.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.15%. On the other hand Seanergy Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 110.76%. Given that Seanergy Maritime Holdings has higher upside potential than Global Ship Lease, analysts believe Seanergy Maritime Holdings is more attractive than Global Ship Lease.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.547, which suggesting that the stock is 54.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.095%.

Global Ship Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 8.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Global Ship Lease pays 20.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays out 264.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Ship Lease's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Seanergy Maritime Holdings's is not.

Global Ship Lease quarterly revenues are $172.5M, which are larger than Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of $44.4M. Global Ship Lease's net income of $81.1M is higher than Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $12.5M. Notably, Global Ship Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Seanergy Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Ship Lease is 1.13x versus 0.82x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.