GRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graco has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 19.81%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 11.13% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.13%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.06%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $90.26 which suggests that it could grow by 8.19%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Graco.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.997%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Graco offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $162.7M, which are smaller than Graco quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $11M is lower than Graco's net income of $108.7M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Graco's PE ratio is 29.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.40x versus 6.81x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 3.38%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 11.13% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.06%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 81.17%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Gorman-Rupp, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Gorman-Rupp.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.966%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $162.7M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $11M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Graham's PE ratio is 35.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.40x versus 1.60x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 11.6%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 11.13% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.06%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $29.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.33%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.348%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $162.7M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $11M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 29.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.40x versus 2.94x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 6.75% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 17.36%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 11.13% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.06%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.02% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.726%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $162.7M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $27M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $11M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.40x versus 3.51x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.