GPRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ecopetrol SA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 10.54%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Ecopetrol SA's return on equity of 19.25%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $16.92, signalling upside risk potential of 58.69%. On the other hand Ecopetrol SA has an analysts' consensus of $8.68 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Ecopetrol SA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Ecopetrol SA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ecopetrol SA has a beta of 1.221, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.051%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Ecopetrol SA offers a yield of 37.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Ecopetrol SA pays out 26.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Ecopetrol SA quarterly revenues of $8.5B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Ecopetrol SA's net income of $893.1M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Ecopetrol SA's PE ratio is 4.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.80x versus 0.52x for Ecopetrol SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 5.09%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 7.85%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $16.92, signalling upside risk potential of 58.69%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.96%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.512%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $49.7M. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $2.5M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 34.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.80x versus 1.50x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Repsol SA has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 1.21%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Repsol SA's return on equity of 12.1%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $16.92, signalling upside risk potential of 58.69%. On the other hand Repsol SA has an analysts' consensus of $10.75 which suggests that it could fall by -10.57%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Repsol SA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Repsol SA.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Repsol SA has a beta of 0.750, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.018%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Repsol SA offers a yield of 8.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Repsol SA pays out 30.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Repsol SA quarterly revenues of $15.1B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is lower than Repsol SA's net income of $182.6M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Repsol SA's PE ratio is 3.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.80x versus 0.19x for Repsol SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunoco LP has a net margin of 15.74% compared to GeoPark's net margin of -0.61%. GeoPark's return on equity of 59.72% beat Sunoco LP's return on equity of 20.66%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $16.92, signalling upside risk potential of 58.69%. On the other hand Sunoco LP has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 15.18%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Sunoco LP, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Sunoco LP.

GeoPark has a beta of 1.354, which suggesting that the stock is 35.405% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunoco LP has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.072%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.52%. Sunoco LP offers a yield of 6.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. GeoPark pays 26.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunoco LP pays out 119.29% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sunoco LP's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $159.5M, which are smaller than Sunoco LP quarterly revenues of $5.8B. GeoPark's net income of $25.1M is higher than Sunoco LP's net income of -$35M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.30x while Sunoco LP's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.80x versus 0.25x for Sunoco LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.