GOLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of -124.64%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 5.04% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $22.65, signalling upside risk potential of 43%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 156.67%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Barrick Gold pays 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Barrick Gold's net income of $483M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.25x versus 24.76x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of -3.98%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 5.04% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $22.65, signalling upside risk potential of 43%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.63 which suggests that it could grow by 78.79%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.457%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barrick Gold pays 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Barrick Gold's net income of $483M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.25x versus 2.04x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmont has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of 20.02%. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 5.04% beat Newmont's return on equity of -4.43%.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $22.65, signalling upside risk potential of 43%. On the other hand Newmont has an analysts' consensus of $54.46 which suggests that it could grow by 42.9%. Given that Barrick Gold has higher upside potential than Newmont, analysts believe Barrick Gold is more attractive than Newmont.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmont has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.376%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Newmont offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Barrick Gold pays 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmont pays out -56.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Newmont quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Barrick Gold's net income of $483M is lower than Newmont's net income of $922M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while Newmont's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.25x versus 2.49x for Newmont. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 14.34% compared to Barrick Gold's net margin of --. Barrick Gold's return on equity of 5.04% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Barrick Gold has a consensus price target of $22.65, signalling upside risk potential of 43%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.62 which suggests that it could grow by 249.97%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Barrick Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Barrick Gold.

Barrick Gold has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.814% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.27%.

Barrick Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barrick Gold pays 55.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barrick Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Barrick Gold quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Barrick Gold's net income of $483M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Barrick Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.03x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barrick Gold is 2.25x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.