GEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of 2.26%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $75.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.67%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Greif.

Greif has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.311%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.67x versus 0.42x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of -3528.43%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $75.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Greif.

Greif has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.67x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of --. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Greif has a consensus price target of $75.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greif has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Greif is more attractive than Northann.

Greif has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.67x versus 0.38x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ranpak Holdings has a net margin of 3.41% compared to Greif's net margin of -11.95%. Greif's return on equity of 9.55% beat Ranpak Holdings's return on equity of -4.37%.

Greif has a consensus price target of $75.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.46%. On the other hand Ranpak Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 81.99%. Given that Ranpak Holdings has higher upside potential than Greif, analysts believe Ranpak Holdings is more attractive than Greif.

Greif has a beta of 0.951, which suggesting that the stock is 4.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ranpak Holdings has a beta of 2.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.149%.

Greif has a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.37%. Ranpak Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greif pays 45.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ranpak Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greif's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greif quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ranpak Holdings quarterly revenues of $91.2M. Greif's net income of $47.3M is higher than Ranpak Holdings's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Greif's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Ranpak Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greif is 0.67x versus 0.77x for Ranpak Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.