FI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paymentus Holdings has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 5.02%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Paymentus Holdings's return on equity of 10.82%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $221.31, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Paymentus Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.80 which suggests that it could fall by -3.62%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Paymentus Holdings, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Paymentus Holdings.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paymentus Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paymentus Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paymentus Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Paymentus Holdings quarterly revenues of $275.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Paymentus Holdings's net income of $13.8M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.00x while Paymentus Holdings's PE ratio is 97.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.56x versus 5.09x for Paymentus Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -568.22%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $221.31, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.00x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.56x versus 2.64x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 4.19%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Toast's return on equity of 11.09%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $221.31, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $43.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.33%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Toast.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Toast's net income of $56M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.00x while Toast's PE ratio is 181.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.56x versus 4.93x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -2.12%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $221.31, signalling upside risk potential of 34.82%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 106.61%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.904, which suggesting that the stock is 9.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.00x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.56x versus 0.24x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.