DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDW has a net margin of 10.74% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 5.74%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09% beat CDW's return on equity of 52.77%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand CDW has an analysts' consensus of $222.69 which suggests that it could grow by 23.04%. Given that CDW has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe CDW is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDW has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.018%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDW offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDW pays out 29.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CDW's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $169.6M, which are smaller than CDW quarterly revenues of $5.5B. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M is lower than CDW's net income of $316.4M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.95x while CDW's PE ratio is 22.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 5.28x versus 1.18x for CDW. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Concentrix has a net margin of 10.74% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 0.7%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09% beat Concentrix's return on equity of 5.29%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand Concentrix has an analysts' consensus of $72.17 which suggests that it could grow by 57.6%. Given that Concentrix has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Concentrix is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concentrix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Concentrix offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix pays out 20.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Concentrix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $169.6M, which are smaller than Concentrix quarterly revenues of $2.4B. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M is higher than Concentrix's net income of $16.6M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.95x while Concentrix's PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 5.28x versus 0.31x for Concentrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of 10.74% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -3%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09% beat UiPath's return on equity of -4.78%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $15.73 which suggests that it could grow by 19.15%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $169.6M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $354.7M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.95x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 5.28x versus 5.28x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 10.74% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -6.48%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 6.09% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -49.55%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $22.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.63%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.54 which suggests that it could grow by 106.48%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $169.6M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $268.3M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $18.2M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$17.4M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.95x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 5.28x versus 3.53x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.