DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data Storage has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 0.3%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Data Storage's return on equity of 0.92%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.44%. On the other hand Data Storage has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 130.18%. Given that Data Storage has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Data Storage is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data Storage has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.975%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Data Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Data Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Data Storage quarterly revenues of $8.1M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Data Storage's net income of $24.1K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.14x while Data Storage's PE ratio is 195.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.42x versus 1.14x for Data Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -17.13%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.44%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.93%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.14x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.42x versus 3.03x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -568.22%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.44%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.14x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.42x versus 3.66x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 1.43% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -2.12%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.53, signalling upside risk potential of 37.44%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $165.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.14x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.42x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.