DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 8.73%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.31%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 22.82%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Brinker International.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.618%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.77%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 25.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.43x versus 1.42x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 8.27%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 69.59%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.31%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $17.47 which suggests that it could grow by 19.47%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than The Wendy's, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than The Wendy's.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.873%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.77%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 6.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 105.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $574.3M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than The Wendy's's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 15.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.43x versus 1.34x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 16.53%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.31%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $313.55 which suggests that it could grow by 39%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Dine Brands Global.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.691%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.77%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 60.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.43x versus 10.59x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 17.91%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 28.31%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $155.33 which suggests that it could fall by -1.29%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.487%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.77%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.53x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.43x versus 5.95x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.