DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Denny's has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 5.83%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Denny's's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Denny's has an analysts' consensus of $7.93 which suggests that it could grow by 23.69%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Denny's, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Denny's.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.746, which suggesting that the stock is 74.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Denny's has a beta of 2.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.487%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Denny's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Denny's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $195M, which are larger than Denny's quarterly revenues of $111.8M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M is higher than Denny's's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.06x while Denny's's PE ratio is 19.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.56x versus 0.75x for Denny's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 7.44%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $193.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.746, which suggesting that the stock is 74.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.638%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $195M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.06x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.56x versus 1.94x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 3.38%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $113.38 which suggests that it could fall by -15.91%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Brinker International.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.746, which suggesting that the stock is 74.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $195M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.06x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 34.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.56x versus 1.42x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 9.77% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 15.84%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.55%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $363.40 which suggests that it could grow by 21.94%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Wingstop.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.746, which suggesting that the stock is 74.599% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.73%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $195M, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $162.5M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M is lower than Wingstop's net income of $25.7M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.06x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 86.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.56x versus 14.85x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.