DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 10.24%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.25%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $208.22 which suggests that it could fall by -2.8%. Given that Darden Restaurants has more downside risk than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.833%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.48%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $214.8M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $8.2M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.66x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 24.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.44x versus 2.17x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 8.36%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.25%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $164.27 which suggests that it could fall by -4.84%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Brinker International.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.618%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.48%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $214.8M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $8.2M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.66x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 23.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.44x versus 1.56x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 0.32%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.25%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $9.88 which suggests that it could grow by 93.63%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Dine Brands Global.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.137%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.48%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $214.8M, which are smaller than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $392.4M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $8.2M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.66x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.44x versus 0.07x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 14.16%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling downside risk potential of -0.25%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $158.39 which suggests that it could grow by 10.04%. Given that Yum Brands has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Yum Brands is more attractive than Dine Brands Global.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.641%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.48%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $214.8M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $8.2M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.66x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 28.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.44x versus 5.29x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.