DBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CSG Systems International has a net margin of -0.99% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of 5.39%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.01% beat CSG Systems International's return on equity of 29.9%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.35%. On the other hand CSG Systems International has an analysts' consensus of $74.56 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than CSG Systems International, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than CSG Systems International.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSG Systems International has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.321%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CSG Systems International offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International pays out 30.64% of its earnings as a dividend. CSG Systems International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $841.1M, which are larger than CSG Systems International quarterly revenues of $299.5M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of -$8.3M is lower than CSG Systems International's net income of $16.1M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while CSG Systems International's PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.50x versus 1.57x for CSG Systems International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of -0.99% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -10.03%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.01% beat Castellum's return on equity of -42.29%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.35%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 183.02%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $841.1M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.50x versus 1.48x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -0.99% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -35.76%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.01% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 20.97%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.35%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $62.60 which suggests that it could grow by 80.14%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $841.1M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $36M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of -$8.3M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 26.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.50x versus 8.30x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of -0.99% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of 2.9%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.01% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $72.33, signalling upside risk potential of 48.35%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 39.95%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.695%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $841.1M, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 108.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.50x versus 2.93x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.