DBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduent has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -1.5%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Conduent's return on equity of 55.8%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $70.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.81%. On the other hand Conduent has an analysts' consensus of $7.03 which suggests that it could grow by 153%. Given that Conduent has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Conduent is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduent has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.987%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduent offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent pays out 2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduent's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Conduent quarterly revenues of $800M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Conduent's net income of -$12M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Conduent's PE ratio is 1.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.44x versus 0.16x for Conduent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of -26.62%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $70.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.81%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Castellum.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 438.042%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.44x versus 1.30x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of 4.51%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.98%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $70.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.81%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.45%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Diebold Nixdorf, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Diebold Nixdorf.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.01%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.3M. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 395.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.44x versus 3.63x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Diebold Nixdorf's net margin of --. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.61% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $70.00, signalling upside risk potential of 60.81%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.06%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Diebold Nixdorf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Diebold Nixdorf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues are $988.9M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Diebold Nixdorf's net income of $5.6M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Diebold Nixdorf's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.62x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diebold Nixdorf is 0.44x versus 9.39x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.