CXW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The GEO Group has a net margin of 5.14% compared to CoreCivic's net margin of 3.24%. CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76% beat The GEO Group's return on equity of 2.19%.

CoreCivic has a consensus price target of $30.70, signalling upside risk potential of 41.34%. On the other hand The GEO Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.80 which suggests that it could grow by 57.2%. Given that The GEO Group has higher upside potential than CoreCivic, analysts believe The GEO Group is more attractive than CoreCivic.

CoreCivic has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The GEO Group has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.613%.

CoreCivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The GEO Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic pays 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The GEO Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic quarterly revenues are $488.6M, which are smaller than The GEO Group quarterly revenues of $604.6M. CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M is higher than The GEO Group's net income of $19.6M. Notably, CoreCivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while The GEO Group's PE ratio is 139.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic is 1.24x versus 1.51x for The GEO Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of 5.14% compared to CoreCivic's net margin of 1.49%. CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

CoreCivic has a consensus price target of $30.70, signalling upside risk potential of 41.34%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.09 which suggests that it could grow by 9.8%. Given that CoreCivic has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe CoreCivic is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

CoreCivic has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.016%.

CoreCivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic pays 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic quarterly revenues are $488.6M, which are larger than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M is higher than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, CoreCivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 259.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic is 1.24x versus 4.54x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems has a net margin of 5.14% compared to CoreCivic's net margin of -9.07%. CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76% beat Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45%.

CoreCivic has a consensus price target of $30.70, signalling upside risk potential of 41.34%. On the other hand Mercury Systems has an analysts' consensus of $46.25 which suggests that it could fall by -1.03%. Given that CoreCivic has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe CoreCivic is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

CoreCivic has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

CoreCivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CoreCivic pays 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic quarterly revenues are $488.6M, which are larger than Mercury Systems quarterly revenues of $211.4M. CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M is higher than Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, CoreCivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Mercury Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic is 1.24x versus 3.08x for Mercury Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of 5.14% compared to CoreCivic's net margin of -658%. CoreCivic's return on equity of 5.76% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -3.88%.

CoreCivic has a consensus price target of $30.70, signalling upside risk potential of 41.34%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CoreCivic has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe CoreCivic is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

CoreCivic has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.938%.

CoreCivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CoreCivic pays 0.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend. CoreCivic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CoreCivic quarterly revenues are $488.6M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $100K. CoreCivic's net income of $25.1M is higher than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, CoreCivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CoreCivic is 1.24x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.