CIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 84.94% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 16.59%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 8.11% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.48%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chimera Investment has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Chimera Investment is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.760, which suggesting that the stock is 75.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.593, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.75%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chimera Investment pays 126.8% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $197M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Chimera Investment's net income of $167.3M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.86x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 75.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 3.52x versus 12.26x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies has a net margin of 84.94% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of -7.37%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 8.11% beat Opendoor Technologies's return on equity of -47.14%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $1.15 which suggests that it could grow by 70.22%. Given that Opendoor Technologies has higher upside potential than Chimera Investment, analysts believe Opendoor Technologies is more attractive than Chimera Investment.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.760, which suggesting that the stock is 75.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Opendoor Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chimera Investment pays 126.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $197M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Chimera Investment's net income of $167.3M is higher than Opendoor Technologies's net income of -$85M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.86x while Opendoor Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 3.52x versus 0.09x for Opendoor Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 84.94% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of -11997.76%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 8.11% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91%.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chimera Investment has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Chimera Investment is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.760, which suggesting that the stock is 75.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chimera Investment pays 126.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $197M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $18.2K. Chimera Investment's net income of $167.3M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.86x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 3.52x versus 9.56x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uniti Group has a net margin of 84.94% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 4.16%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 8.11% beat Uniti Group's return on equity of --.

Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.32%. On the other hand Uniti Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.76 which suggests that it could grow by 30.55%. Given that Uniti Group has higher upside potential than Chimera Investment, analysts believe Uniti Group is more attractive than Chimera Investment.

Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.760, which suggesting that the stock is 75.991% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uniti Group has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.496%.

Chimera Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.06%. Uniti Group offers a yield of 13.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Chimera Investment pays 126.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Uniti Group pays out 116.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chimera Investment quarterly revenues are $197M, which are smaller than Uniti Group quarterly revenues of $293.9M. Chimera Investment's net income of $167.3M is higher than Uniti Group's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Chimera Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.86x while Uniti Group's PE ratio is 16.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chimera Investment is 3.52x versus 0.89x for Uniti Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.