BV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 3.51% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 5.83%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 3.79% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 10.14%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.54, signalling upside risk potential of 16.05%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $49.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.41%. Given that Cass Information Systems has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe Cass Information Systems is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.301, which suggesting that the stock is 30.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.176%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 53.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $728.7M, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $50.4M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $25.6M is higher than Cass Information Systems's net income of $2.9M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.27x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 24.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.55x versus 2.90x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 3.51% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 17.51%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 3.79% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.05%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.54, signalling upside risk potential of 16.05%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $194.84 which suggests that it could fall by -1.75%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Cintas.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.301, which suggesting that the stock is 30.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.287%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $728.7M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BrightView Holdings's net income of $25.6M is lower than Cintas's net income of $448.5M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.27x while Cintas's PE ratio is 47.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.55x versus 8.22x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 3.51% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -47.19%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 3.79% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -15.5%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.54, signalling upside risk potential of 16.05%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $13.13 which suggests that it could grow by 54.41%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.301, which suggesting that the stock is 30.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.56%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $728.7M, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $145.6M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $25.6M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$68.7M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.27x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.55x versus 0.49x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 3.51% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -0.38%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 3.79% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.54, signalling upside risk potential of 16.05%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 282.51%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.301, which suggesting that the stock is 30.136% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $728.7M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $25.6M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 145.27x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 3.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.55x versus 0.20x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.