BTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cornerstone Building Brands has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of --. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Cornerstone Building Brands's return on equity of --.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 41.44%. On the other hand Cornerstone Building Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Cornerstone Building Brands, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Cornerstone Building Brands.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.318% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cornerstone Building Brands has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Cornerstone Building Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cornerstone Building Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Cornerstone Building Brands quarterly revenues of --. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than Cornerstone Building Brands's net income of --. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Cornerstone Building Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.46x versus -- for Cornerstone Building Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 8.47%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -94.19%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 41.44%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 28.36%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Hallador Energy, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Hallador Energy.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.318% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.474%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peabody Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $117.8M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than Hallador Energy's net income of $10M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.46x versus 1.65x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 7.47%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat NACCO Industries's return on equity of 8.62%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 41.44%. On the other hand NACCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.58%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than NACCO Industries, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than NACCO Industries.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.318% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.917%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. NACCO Industries offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NACCO Industries pays out 19.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than NACCO Industries quarterly revenues of $65.6M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is higher than NACCO Industries's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while NACCO Industries's PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.46x versus 1.10x for NACCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Resources Partners LP has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of 72.29%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of 9.96% beat Natural Resources Partners LP's return on equity of 31.24%.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 41.44%. On the other hand Natural Resources Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.33%. Given that Peabody Energy has higher upside potential than Natural Resources Partners LP, analysts believe Peabody Energy is more attractive than Natural Resources Partners LP.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.527, which suggesting that the stock is 47.318% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Resources Partners LP has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.98%.

Peabody Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Natural Resources Partners LP offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Peabody Energy pays 10.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Resources Partners LP pays out 42.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peabody Energy quarterly revenues are $937M, which are larger than Natural Resources Partners LP quarterly revenues of $55.7M. Peabody Energy's net income of $34.4M is lower than Natural Resources Partners LP's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Peabody Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.08x while Natural Resources Partners LP's PE ratio is 9.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peabody Energy is 0.46x versus 5.53x for Natural Resources Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.