BHE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plexus has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.92%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.76% beat Plexus's return on equity of 8.83%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.79%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $157.50 which suggests that it could fall by -5.89%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has more downside risk than Plexus, analysts believe Plexus is more attractive than Benchmark Electronics.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.185%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 36.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are smaller than Plexus quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than Plexus's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Plexus's PE ratio is 41.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.65x versus 1.18x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.04%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.76% beat Sanmina's return on equity of 9.58%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.79%. On the other hand Sanmina has an analysts' consensus of $71.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.43%. Given that Sanmina has more downside risk than Benchmark Electronics, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sanmina.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.505%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Sanmina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 36.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are smaller than Sanmina quarterly revenues of $2B. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than Sanmina's net income of $61.4M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Sanmina's PE ratio is 21.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.65x versus 0.62x for Sanmina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sigmatron International has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of -12.67%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.76% beat Sigmatron International's return on equity of -24.24%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.79%. On the other hand Sigmatron International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Sigmatron International, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sigmatron International.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sigmatron International has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.559%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Sigmatron International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 36.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Sigmatron International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are larger than Sigmatron International quarterly revenues of $74.7M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than Sigmatron International's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Sigmatron International's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.65x versus 0.03x for Sigmatron International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 2.32%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 5.76% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 4.5%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling downside risk potential of -7.79%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $30.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.77%. Given that TTM Technologies has higher upside potential than Benchmark Electronics, analysts believe TTM Technologies is more attractive than Benchmark Electronics.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.221%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 36.47% of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $657.7M, which are larger than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $616.5M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than TTM Technologies's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 38.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.65x versus 1.12x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.