BG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer-Daniels Midland has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 0.09%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.16% beat Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $103.13, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Archer-Daniels Midland has an analysts' consensus of $55.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels Midland, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels Midland.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.700, which suggesting that the stock is 29.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.562%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Archer-Daniels Midland offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 17.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are smaller than Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues of $19.9B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $221M is higher than Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Archer-Daniels Midland's PE ratio is 14.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus 0.30x for Archer-Daniels Midland. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.16% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $103.13, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.700, which suggesting that the stock is 29.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.378%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 17.08% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $221M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 3.7%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.16% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $103.13, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $103.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.3%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.700, which suggesting that the stock is 29.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 17.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Bunge Global SA's net income of $221M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus 0.88x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMeWorld has a net margin of 1.71% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 10.16% beat UMeWorld's return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $103.13, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand UMeWorld has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than UMeWorld, analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than UMeWorld.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.700, which suggesting that the stock is 29.999% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMeWorld has a beta of -2.147, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.683%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.4%. UMeWorld offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 17.08% of its earnings as a dividend. UMeWorld pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $12.9B, which are larger than UMeWorld quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $221M is higher than UMeWorld's net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while UMeWorld's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.21x versus -- for UMeWorld. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.