BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 7.18%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $156.56, signalling upside risk potential of 15.06%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of $234.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.08%. Given that FTI Consulting has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe FTI Consulting is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.139, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.112%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $926M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.55x versus 1.83x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 7.18%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $156.56, signalling upside risk potential of 15.06%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $140.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.74%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.600, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.998%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 27.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.55x versus 1.63x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 6.32%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.6%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $156.56, signalling upside risk potential of 15.06%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $174.75 which suggests that it could grow by 35.01%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.97%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $517M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than ICF International's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while ICF International's PE ratio is 22.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.55x versus 1.23x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 12.4% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 5.51%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 75.5% beat Maximus's return on equity of 17.37%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $156.56, signalling upside risk potential of 15.06%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of $102.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.14%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.549, which suggesting that the stock is 45.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.397%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $390.1M is higher than Maximus's net income of $72.5M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while Maximus's PE ratio is 15.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.55x versus 0.91x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.