BAH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 5.56%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 77.32% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 13.09%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $154.52, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of $196.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.77%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.137, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.265%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $894.9M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $187M is higher than FTI Consulting's net income of $49.7M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.75x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.23x versus 1.58x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 8.51%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 77.32% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 22.32%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $154.52, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of $165.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.01%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.859%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $399.3M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $187M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $34M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.75x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 23.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.23x versus 1.80x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICF International has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 4.95%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 77.32% beat ICF International's return on equity of 11.63%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $154.52, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand ICF International has an analysts' consensus of $108.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is more attractive than ICF International.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICF International has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.532%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. ICF International offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International pays out 9.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than ICF International quarterly revenues of $496.3M. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $187M is higher than ICF International's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.75x while ICF International's PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.23x versus 0.80x for ICF International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 6.41% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net margin of 2.94%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's return on equity of 77.32% beat Maximus's return on equity of 16.11%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a consensus price target of $154.52, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of $102.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.99%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than Booz Allen Hamilton Holding.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.99%.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.85%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding pays 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's net income of $187M is higher than Maximus's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.75x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding is 1.23x versus 0.76x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.