B Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enovix has a net margin of -0.55% compared to Barnes Group's net margin of -522.03%. Barnes Group's return on equity of -3.01% beat Enovix's return on equity of -112.38%.

Barnes Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 122.81%. Given that Enovix has higher upside potential than Barnes Group, analysts believe Enovix is more attractive than Barnes Group.

Barnes Group has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Barnes Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barnes Group pays 202.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Barnes Group quarterly revenues are $387.8M, which are larger than Enovix quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Barnes Group's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Enovix's net income of -$22.5M. Notably, Barnes Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 386.67x while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barnes Group is 1.50x versus 100.40x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manitex International has a net margin of -0.55% compared to Barnes Group's net margin of 0.64%. Barnes Group's return on equity of -3.01% beat Manitex International's return on equity of 11.68%.

Barnes Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Manitex International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Barnes Group has higher upside potential than Manitex International, analysts believe Barnes Group is more attractive than Manitex International.

Barnes Group has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manitex International has a beta of 0.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.728%.

Barnes Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Manitex International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barnes Group pays 202.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Manitex International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Barnes Group quarterly revenues are $387.8M, which are larger than Manitex International quarterly revenues of $66.5M. Barnes Group's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Manitex International's net income of $427K. Notably, Barnes Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 386.67x while Manitex International's PE ratio is 12.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barnes Group is 1.50x versus 0.40x for Manitex International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nxu has a net margin of -0.55% compared to Barnes Group's net margin of -83200%. Barnes Group's return on equity of -3.01% beat Nxu's return on equity of -393.64%.

Barnes Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Nxu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13960.67%. Given that Nxu has higher upside potential than Barnes Group, analysts believe Nxu is more attractive than Barnes Group.

Barnes Group has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nxu has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Barnes Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Nxu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Barnes Group pays 202.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Nxu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Barnes Group quarterly revenues are $387.8M, which are larger than Nxu quarterly revenues of $6K. Barnes Group's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Nxu's net income of -$5M. Notably, Barnes Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 386.67x while Nxu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barnes Group is 1.50x versus 16.97x for Nxu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of -0.55% compared to Barnes Group's net margin of 14.24%. Barnes Group's return on equity of -3.01% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

Barnes Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.42%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $738.41 which suggests that it could grow by 15.11%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than Barnes Group, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than Barnes Group.

Barnes Group has a beta of 1.321, which suggesting that the stock is 32.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.292%.

Barnes Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.36%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Barnes Group pays 202.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Barnes Group's is not.

Barnes Group quarterly revenues are $387.8M, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Barnes Group's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, Barnes Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 386.67x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Barnes Group is 1.50x versus 4.19x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.