AOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aura Systems has a net margin of 12.02% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of -213000%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 28.27% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $76.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.91%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Aura Systems.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.203%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $912.4M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $3K. A.O. Smith's net income of $109.7M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$540K. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 370.66x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 12.02% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 6.93%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 28.27% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $76.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.91%. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of $109.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.42%. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.206%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $912.4M, which are larger than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $485.7M. A.O. Smith's net income of $109.7M is higher than Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 2.24x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 12.02% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 10.44%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 28.27% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $76.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.91%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $173.20 which suggests that it could grow by 27.2%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.834%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $912.4M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. A.O. Smith's net income of $109.7M is lower than Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 25.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 1.91x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 12.02% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 2.82%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 28.27% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.09%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of $76.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.91%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $178.36 which suggests that it could grow by 43.19%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.397% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.378%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.98%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. A.O. Smith pays 35.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $912.4M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. A.O. Smith's net income of $109.7M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $41.2M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.38x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 42.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.57x versus 1.38x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.