ALUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Retractable Technologies has a net margin of -167.77% compared to Allurion Technologies's net margin of -18.58%. Allurion Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Retractable Technologies's return on equity of -16.83%.

Allurion Technologies has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 628.29%. On the other hand Retractable Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Allurion Technologies has higher upside potential than Retractable Technologies, analysts believe Allurion Technologies is more attractive than Retractable Technologies.

Allurion Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Retractable Technologies has a beta of 2.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.265%.

Allurion Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Retractable Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allurion Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Retractable Technologies pays out -3.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Allurion Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are smaller than Retractable Technologies quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Allurion Technologies's net income of -$9M is lower than Retractable Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Allurion Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Retractable Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allurion Technologies is 0.14x versus 0.59x for Retractable Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VolitionRX has a net margin of -167.77% compared to Allurion Technologies's net margin of -1226.82%. Allurion Technologies's return on equity of -- beat VolitionRX's return on equity of --.

Allurion Technologies has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 628.29%. On the other hand VolitionRX has an analysts' consensus of $3.37 which suggests that it could grow by 501.2%. Given that Allurion Technologies has higher upside potential than VolitionRX, analysts believe Allurion Technologies is more attractive than VolitionRX.

Allurion Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VolitionRX has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.182%.

Allurion Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VolitionRX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allurion Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VolitionRX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allurion Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are larger than VolitionRX quarterly revenues of $474.5K. Allurion Technologies's net income of -$9M is lower than VolitionRX's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Allurion Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VolitionRX's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allurion Technologies is 0.14x versus 36.22x for VolitionRX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Catheter Precision has a net margin of -167.77% compared to Allurion Technologies's net margin of -4291.67%. Allurion Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Catheter Precision's return on equity of -65.84%.

Allurion Technologies has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 628.29%. On the other hand Catheter Precision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 419.62%. Given that Allurion Technologies has higher upside potential than Catheter Precision, analysts believe Allurion Technologies is more attractive than Catheter Precision.

Allurion Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Catheter Precision has a beta of -0.541, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.132%.

Allurion Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Catheter Precision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allurion Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Catheter Precision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allurion Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are larger than Catheter Precision quarterly revenues of $96K. Allurion Technologies's net income of -$9M is lower than Catheter Precision's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Allurion Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Catheter Precision's PE ratio is 0.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allurion Technologies is 0.14x versus 1.03x for Catheter Precision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xtant Medical Holdings has a net margin of -167.77% compared to Allurion Technologies's net margin of -10.04%. Allurion Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Xtant Medical Holdings's return on equity of -35.34%.

Allurion Technologies has a consensus price target of $17.33, signalling upside risk potential of 628.29%. On the other hand Xtant Medical Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 264.58%. Given that Allurion Technologies has higher upside potential than Xtant Medical Holdings, analysts believe Allurion Technologies is more attractive than Xtant Medical Holdings.

Allurion Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtant Medical Holdings has a beta of 0.413, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.747%.

Allurion Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xtant Medical Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Allurion Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtant Medical Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Allurion Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.4M, which are smaller than Xtant Medical Holdings quarterly revenues of $31.5M. Allurion Technologies's net income of -$9M is lower than Xtant Medical Holdings's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Allurion Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtant Medical Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allurion Technologies is 0.14x versus 0.55x for Xtant Medical Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.