ZEO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Zeo Energy's net margin of -45.45%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69% beat AXT's return on equity of -7.08%.

Zeo Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $3.85 which suggests that it could grow by 200.78%. Given that AXT has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe AXT is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 1.956, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.644%.

Zeo Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeo Energy pays 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zeo Energy quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K is higher than AXT's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Zeo Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeo Energy is 0.06x versus 0.58x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entegris has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Zeo Energy's net margin of 12.03%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.31%.

Zeo Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $114.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.85%. Given that Entegris has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe Entegris is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.291%.

Zeo Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Zeo Energy pays 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zeo Energy quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $849.8M. Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K is lower than Entegris's net income of $102.2M. Notably, Zeo Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Entegris's PE ratio is 40.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeo Energy is 0.06x versus 3.67x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FormFactor has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Zeo Energy's net margin of 3.74%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69% beat FormFactor's return on equity of 5.72%.

Zeo Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FormFactor has an analysts' consensus of $39.44 which suggests that it could grow by 32.99%. Given that FormFactor has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe FormFactor is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FormFactor has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.592%.

Zeo Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FormFactor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeo Energy pays 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. FormFactor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zeo Energy quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than FormFactor quarterly revenues of $171.4M. Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K is lower than FormFactor's net income of $6.4M. Notably, Zeo Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FormFactor's PE ratio is 42.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeo Energy is 0.06x versus 3.03x for FormFactor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Zeo Energy's net margin of -8.74%. Zeo Energy's return on equity of 9.69% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

Zeo Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.32%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than Zeo Energy, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than Zeo Energy.

Zeo Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.626, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.563%.

Zeo Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeo Energy pays 83.03% of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeo Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zeo Energy quarterly revenues are $14.7M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Zeo Energy's net income of $167.2K is higher than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Zeo Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeo Energy is 0.06x versus 0.61x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.