WRLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of 18.3% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 7.74%. World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 12.32%.

World Acceptance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.69%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than World Acceptance.

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.832%.

World Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. World Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 28.22% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

World Acceptance quarterly revenues are $121M, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $837.3M. World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $64.8M. Notably, World Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.73x while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 19.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for World Acceptance is 1.24x versus 1.40x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of 18.3% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of -13.48%. World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -25.87%.

World Acceptance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that World Acceptance has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe World Acceptance is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.082%.

World Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. World Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

World Acceptance quarterly revenues are $121M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.3M. World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M is higher than Old Market Capital's net income of -$451K. Notably, World Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.73x while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for World Acceptance is 1.24x versus -- for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OneMain Holdings has a net margin of 18.3% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 13.49%. World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13% beat OneMain Holdings's return on equity of 17.27%.

World Acceptance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand OneMain Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $54.46 which suggests that it could grow by 11.2%. Given that OneMain Holdings has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe OneMain Holdings is more attractive than World Acceptance.

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneMain Holdings has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.99%.

World Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OneMain Holdings offers a yield of 7.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. World Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings pays out 75.98% of its earnings as a dividend. OneMain Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

World Acceptance quarterly revenues are $121M, which are smaller than OneMain Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M is lower than OneMain Holdings's net income of $157M. Notably, World Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.73x while OneMain Holdings's PE ratio is 11.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for World Acceptance is 1.24x versus 1.43x for OneMain Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of 18.3% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of -11.76%. World Acceptance's return on equity of 20.13% beat SLM's return on equity of 32.57%.

World Acceptance has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that SLM has higher upside potential than World Acceptance, analysts believe SLM is more attractive than World Acceptance.

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.419, which suggesting that the stock is 41.866% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.467%.

World Acceptance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. World Acceptance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 20.46% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

World Acceptance quarterly revenues are $121M, which are smaller than SLM quarterly revenues of $383.9M. World Acceptance's net income of $22.1M is higher than SLM's net income of -$45.2M. Notably, World Acceptance's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.73x while SLM's PE ratio is 9.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for World Acceptance is 1.24x versus 3.28x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.