VALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 57.34%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.94%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $260.24 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that CME Group has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe CME Group is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.303%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 101.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than CME Group's net income of $874.6M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while CME Group's PE ratio is 26.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 9.79x versus 14.94x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 56.84%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 30.9%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $314.12 which suggests that it could grow by 95.65%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 9.79x versus 6.60x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 19.78%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $371.67 which suggests that it could grow by 38.29%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.161, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.086%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $591M. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $116.9M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 31.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 9.79x versus 5.09x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 17.49%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 10.19%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $88.39 which suggests that it could grow by 29.51%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.952, which suggesting that the stock is 4.761% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.075%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2B. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $355M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 35.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 9.79x versus 5.34x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.