VALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 64.3% compared to Value Line's net margin of 57.61%. Value Line's return on equity of 24.37% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.57%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $242.38 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that CME Group has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe CME Group is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.301% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.731%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.80 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 100.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $8.8M, which are smaller than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Value Line's net income of $5.7M is lower than CME Group's net income of $912.8M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.73x while CME Group's PE ratio is 24.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 14.03x versus 13.90x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 64.3% compared to Value Line's net margin of 6.26%. Value Line's return on equity of 24.37% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 20.89%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $292.28 which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.301% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $8.8M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Value Line's net income of $5.7M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.73x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 44.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 14.03x versus 14.14x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 64.3% compared to Value Line's net margin of 21.02%. Value Line's return on equity of 24.37% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 23.47%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.301% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.256%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 45.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $8.8M, which are smaller than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $569.4M. Value Line's net income of $5.7M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $119.7M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.73x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 44.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 14.03x versus 6.59x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 64.3% compared to Value Line's net margin of 16.09%. Value Line's return on equity of 24.37% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.301% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $8.8M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Value Line's net income of $5.7M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.73x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 46.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 14.03x versus 6.39x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.