UXIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of 3.35%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 960.17%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 87.03%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Uxin has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.319%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.66x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cango has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of --. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat Cango's return on equity of 3.59%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 960.17%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -39.71%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Cango.

Uxin has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.569%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are larger than Cango quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Cango's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango's PE ratio is 18.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.66x versus 13.27x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of -27.53%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 960.17%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 36.7%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than NIO.

Uxin has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.66x versus 1.04x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -12.24% compared to Uxin's net margin of 23.9%. Uxin's return on equity of -- beat Tuniu's return on equity of -2.93%.

Uxin has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 960.17%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 146.51%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Tuniu, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Tuniu.

Uxin has a beta of 1.368, which suggesting that the stock is 36.753% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.678, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.838%.

Uxin has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uxin pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uxin quarterly revenues are $69.4M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $26M. Uxin's net income of -$8.5M is lower than Tuniu's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Uxin's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uxin is 2.66x versus 1.67x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.