UPST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EZCORP has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 8.29%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.54, signalling upside risk potential of 21.99%. On the other hand EZCORP has an analysts' consensus of $20.75 which suggests that it could grow by 54.28%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EZCORP has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.921%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EZCORP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EZCORP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than EZCORP quarterly revenues of $306.3M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than EZCORP's net income of $25.4M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EZCORP's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 6.03x versus 0.94x for EZCORP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 9.99%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.54, signalling upside risk potential of 21.99%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $147.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.93%. Given that Upstart Holdings has higher upside potential than FirstCash Holdings, analysts believe Upstart Holdings is more attractive than FirstCash Holdings.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.283%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $836.4M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 20.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 6.03x versus 1.70x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of -3.85%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -7.14%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.54, signalling upside risk potential of 21.99%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Upstart Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe Upstart Holdings is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.673%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Old Market Capital's net income of -$124K. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 6.03x versus 8.37x for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 52.42%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat SLM's return on equity of 28.08%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.54, signalling upside risk potential of 21.99%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $34.73 which suggests that it could grow by 7.32%. Given that Upstart Holdings has higher upside potential than SLM, analysts believe Upstart Holdings is more attractive than SLM.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.527%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than SLM quarterly revenues of $581M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than SLM's net income of $304.5M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SLM's PE ratio is 11.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 6.03x versus 3.75x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.