TRNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Industrial has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Transcat's net margin of 4.91%. Transcat's return on equity of 8.06% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $121.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 65.56%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.885%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $342.4M. Transcat's net income of $3.3M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.86x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 3.61x versus 0.69x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Transcat's net margin of 5.85%. Transcat's return on equity of 8.06% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 18.19%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $121.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.5%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

Transcat has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.814%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $952.3M. Transcat's net income of $3.3M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $55.7M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.86x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 3.61x versus 1.16x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Transcat's net margin of -0.59%. Transcat's return on equity of 8.06% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $121.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.67%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.364%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Transcat's net income of $3.3M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.86x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 28.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 3.61x versus 0.13x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 4.85% compared to Transcat's net margin of 3.72%. Transcat's return on equity of 8.06% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.01%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $121.20, signalling upside risk potential of 11.95%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $222.43 which suggests that it could grow by 22.6%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.707, which suggesting that the stock is 29.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.509%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 17.51% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $67.8M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Transcat's net income of $3.3M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $204.3M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 53.86x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 3.61x versus 0.43x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.