TRNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Industrial has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of 3.54%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.79%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.676%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $302.3M. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.28x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.87x versus 0.65x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of 4.41%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 15.31%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.34%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

Transcat has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.556%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $891.7M. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $39.3M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.28x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 20.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.87x versus 1.16x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of -0.43%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.54%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Transcat has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.09%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1B. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.28x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.87x versus 0.17x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of 3.01%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.43%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 17.65%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $207.95 which suggests that it could grow by 28.68%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 1.826, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.639%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is lower than WESCO International's net income of $165.4M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.28x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 12.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.87x versus 0.38x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.