TRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 18.95%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 9.04%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $181.92, signalling downside risk potential of -3.52%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Cass Information Systems has higher upside potential than Thomson Reuters, analysts believe Cass Information Systems is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.789%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 85.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $47.3M. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than Cass Information Systems's net income of $9M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.37x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 27.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.69x versus 3.05x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of 17.76%. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $181.92, signalling downside risk potential of -3.52%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $209.54 which suggests that it could fall by -2.59%. Given that Thomson Reuters has more downside risk than Cintas, analysts believe Cintas is more attractive than Thomson Reuters.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.26%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.37x while Cintas's PE ratio is 49.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.69x versus 8.72x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviro Serv has a net margin of 22.84% compared to Thomson Reuters's net margin of --. Thomson Reuters's return on equity of 18.39% beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $181.92, signalling downside risk potential of -3.52%. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thomson Reuters has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe Thomson Reuters is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.593% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 1.303, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.316%.

Thomson Reuters has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thomson Reuters pays 42.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Thomson Reuters's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thomson Reuters quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. Thomson Reuters's net income of $434M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, Thomson Reuters's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.37x while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thomson Reuters is 11.69x versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.