THRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of -38.85%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -46.72% beat Groupon's return on equity of -240.37%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Groupon.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.439% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.458%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Groupon quarterly revenues of $130.4M. Thryv Holdings's net income of $7.9M is higher than Groupon's net income of -$50.6M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.51x versus 1.40x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 43.07%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -46.72% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 38.66%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $762.99 which suggests that it could grow by 51.17%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.439% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.917%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $48.4B. Thryv Holdings's net income of $7.9M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $20.8B. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.51x versus 8.01x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 3.31%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -46.72% beat comScore's return on equity of -211.7%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $7.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.86%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than comScore.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.439% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.035%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than comScore quarterly revenues of $94.9M. Thryv Holdings's net income of $7.9M is higher than comScore's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.51x versus 0.07x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of -24.06%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -46.72% beat Zedge's return on equity of -6.45%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.80, signalling upside risk potential of 125.25%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.55%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Zedge.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.439% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.607%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7M. Thryv Holdings's net income of $7.9M is higher than Zedge's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.51x versus 1.05x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.