THRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of -53.42% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 12.17%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77% beat Groupon's return on equity of 297.62%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.52%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.53%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Groupon.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.012999999999996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 1.721, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.084%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.9M, which are larger than Groupon quarterly revenues of $114.5M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M is lower than Groupon's net income of $13.9M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.62x versus 0.92x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -53.42% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 38.65%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 36.21%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.52%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $654.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.04%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.012999999999996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.786%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.9M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $40.6B. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $15.7B. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.62x versus 10.06x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of -53.42% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of -68.53%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77% beat comScore's return on equity of -108.24%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.52%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.98%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than comScore.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.012999999999996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.012%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.9M, which are larger than comScore quarterly revenues of $88.5M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M is lower than comScore's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.62x versus 0.08x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of -53.42% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of -4.71%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -170.77% beat Zedge's return on equity of -29.39%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 73.52%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.62%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Zedge.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.012999999999996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.92%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $179.9M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$96.1M is lower than Zedge's net income of -$339K. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.62x versus 1.46x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.