STRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delcath Systems has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 16.64%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Delcath Systems's return on equity of -251.36%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 359.77%. On the other hand Delcath Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 78.37%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Delcath Systems, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Delcath Systems.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 91.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delcath Systems has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.882%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delcath Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Delcath Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are larger than Delcath Systems quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is lower than Delcath Systems's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.70x while Delcath Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 14.33x for Delcath Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exact Sciences has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of -5.4%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Exact Sciences's return on equity of -6.77%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 359.77%. On the other hand Exact Sciences has an analysts' consensus of $71.86 which suggests that it could grow by 24.86%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Exact Sciences, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Exact Sciences.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 91.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exact Sciences has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.719%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exact Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Exact Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Exact Sciences quarterly revenues of $708.7M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is higher than Exact Sciences's net income of -$38.2M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.70x while Exact Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 3.91x for Exact Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illumina has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 65.28%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Illumina's return on equity of -37.83%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 359.77%. On the other hand Illumina has an analysts' consensus of $148.36 which suggests that it could grow by 20.88%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Illumina, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Illumina.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 91.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illumina has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.544%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Illumina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Illumina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Illumina quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is lower than Illumina's net income of $705M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.70x while Illumina's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 4.90x for Illumina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progyny has a net margin of -14.42% compared to Star Equity Holdings's net margin of 3.64%. Star Equity Holdings's return on equity of -10.13% beat Progyny's return on equity of 11.31%.

Star Equity Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 359.77%. On the other hand Progyny has an analysts' consensus of $30.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.58%. Given that Star Equity Holdings has higher upside potential than Progyny, analysts believe Star Equity Holdings is more attractive than Progyny.

Star Equity Holdings has a beta of 0.080, which suggesting that the stock is 91.951% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progyny has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.952%.

Star Equity Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Progyny offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Star Equity Holdings pays 7.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Progyny pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Star Equity Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Star Equity Holdings quarterly revenues are $13.7M, which are smaller than Progyny quarterly revenues of $286.6M. Star Equity Holdings's net income of -$2M is lower than Progyny's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Star Equity Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.70x while Progyny's PE ratio is 29.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Star Equity Holdings is 0.14x versus 1.46x for Progyny. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.