SPCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of 4.61%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.58%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $264.07 which suggests that it could fall by -11.33%. Given that Elbit Systems has more downside risk than SuperCom, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.126%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.7B. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 50.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.43x versus 2.04x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of -1.79%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.58%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that Kornit Digital has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Kornit Digital is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.206%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.43x versus 7.10x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of --. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.58%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 542.2%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.43x versus -- for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to SuperCom's net margin of 7.08%. SuperCom's return on equity of -- beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling downside risk potential of -10.58%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.91%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.002% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.14%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $40.5M. SuperCom's net income of -- is lower than TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.43x versus 2.07x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.