SPCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of 5.65%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 11.29%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.96%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $357.33 which suggests that it could fall by -21.28%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.712% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.154%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $107.1M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 57.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.70x versus 2.84x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of -10.89%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -1.14%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.96%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 57.94%. Given that Kornit Digital has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Kornit Digital is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.712% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.867%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $46.5M. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.70x versus 4.35x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of --. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.96%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 493.47%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.712% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.70x versus 4.31x for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of 9.05%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.96%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.34%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 1.087, which suggesting that the stock is 8.712% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.557%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 22.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.70x versus 1.79x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.