SHIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dycom Industries has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 3.01%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 20.24%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $217.14 which suggests that it could grow by 37.9%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than Dycom Industries.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.858%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $32.7M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 19.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.09x versus 0.99x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Services of America has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 0.85%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat Energy Services of America's return on equity of 49.42%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Energy Services of America has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 107.9%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Services of America has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.961%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Services of America offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America pays out 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are larger than Energy Services of America quarterly revenues of $100.6M. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Energy Services of America's net income of $853.7K. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Services of America's PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.09x versus 0.44x for Energy Services of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 2.2%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat MasTec's return on equity of 5.83%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $168.57 which suggests that it could grow by 35.79%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than MasTec.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.772%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than MasTec's net income of $74.7M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MasTec's PE ratio is 60.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.09x versus 0.79x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYR Group has a net margin of -0.94% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 1.92%. Shimmick's return on equity of -290.81% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 4.82%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $154.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 27.8%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than MYR Group.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.291%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $166M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $829.8M. Shimmick's net income of -$1.6M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $16M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MYR Group's PE ratio is 65.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.09x versus 0.59x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.