SHBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens & Northern has a net margin of 25.95% compared to Shore Bancshares's net margin of 23.66%. Shore Bancshares's return on equity of 9.28% beat Citizens & Northern's return on equity of 9.91%.

Shore Bancshares has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Citizens & Northern has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.51%. Given that Shore Bancshares has higher upside potential than Citizens & Northern, analysts believe Shore Bancshares is more attractive than Citizens & Northern.

Shore Bancshares has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens & Northern has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.907%.

Shore Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Citizens & Northern offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Shore Bancshares pays 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens & Northern pays out 59.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shore Bancshares quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Citizens & Northern quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Shore Bancshares's net income of $13.8M is higher than Citizens & Northern's net income of $6.3M. Notably, Shore Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Citizens & Northern's PE ratio is 10.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shore Bancshares is 2.37x versus 2.71x for Citizens & Northern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Farmers National Banc has a net margin of 25.95% compared to Shore Bancshares's net margin of 30.39%. Shore Bancshares's return on equity of 9.28% beat Farmers National Banc's return on equity of 11.67%.

Shore Bancshares has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Farmers National Banc has an analysts' consensus of $14.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.61%. Given that Shore Bancshares has higher upside potential than Farmers National Banc, analysts believe Shore Bancshares is more attractive than Farmers National Banc.

Shore Bancshares has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Farmers National Banc has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.875%.

Shore Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Farmers National Banc offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Shore Bancshares pays 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Farmers National Banc pays out 55.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shore Bancshares quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Farmers National Banc quarterly revenues of $44.7M. Shore Bancshares's net income of $13.8M is higher than Farmers National Banc's net income of $13.6M. Notably, Shore Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Farmers National Banc's PE ratio is 10.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shore Bancshares is 2.37x versus 2.86x for Farmers National Banc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 25.95% compared to Shore Bancshares's net margin of 32.94%. Shore Bancshares's return on equity of 9.28% beat Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.59%.

Shore Bancshares has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Hancock Whitney has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.63%. Given that Shore Bancshares has higher upside potential than Hancock Whitney, analysts believe Shore Bancshares is more attractive than Hancock Whitney.

Shore Bancshares has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hancock Whitney has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.506%.

Shore Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Hancock Whitney offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Shore Bancshares pays 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 28.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shore Bancshares quarterly revenues are $53M, which are smaller than Hancock Whitney quarterly revenues of $362.8M. Shore Bancshares's net income of $13.8M is lower than Hancock Whitney's net income of $119.5M. Notably, Shore Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Hancock Whitney's PE ratio is 10.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shore Bancshares is 2.37x versus 3.34x for Hancock Whitney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mid Penn Bancorp has a net margin of 25.95% compared to Shore Bancshares's net margin of 29.21%. Shore Bancshares's return on equity of 9.28% beat Mid Penn Bancorp's return on equity of 8.49%.

Shore Bancshares has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.49%. On the other hand Mid Penn Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.35%. Given that Mid Penn Bancorp has higher upside potential than Shore Bancshares, analysts believe Mid Penn Bancorp is more attractive than Shore Bancshares.

Shore Bancshares has a beta of 0.930, which suggesting that the stock is 7.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mid Penn Bancorp has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.526%.

Shore Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.26%. Mid Penn Bancorp offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Shore Bancshares pays 36.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Mid Penn Bancorp pays out 27.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shore Bancshares quarterly revenues are $53M, which are larger than Mid Penn Bancorp quarterly revenues of $47M. Shore Bancshares's net income of $13.8M is higher than Mid Penn Bancorp's net income of $13.7M. Notably, Shore Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.88x while Mid Penn Bancorp's PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shore Bancshares is 2.37x versus 2.66x for Mid Penn Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.