SELX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Himax Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Semilux International's net margin of 5.86%. Semilux International's return on equity of -- beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 9.08%.

Semilux International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $10.87 which suggests that it could grow by 22.79%. Given that Himax Technologies has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Himax Technologies is more attractive than Semilux International.

Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 1.940, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.963%.

Semilux International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Semilux International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 165.7% of its earnings as a dividend.

Semilux International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $222.4M. Semilux International's net income of -- is lower than Himax Technologies's net income of $13M. Notably, Semilux International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Semilux International is -- versus 1.67x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a net margin of -- compared to Semilux International's net margin of --. Semilux International's return on equity of -- beat ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's return on equity of 7.23%.

Semilux International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Semilux International has higher upside potential than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES, analysts believe Semilux International is more attractive than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES.

Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.813%.

Semilux International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES offers a yield of 6.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Semilux International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES pays out 85.01% of its earnings as a dividend. ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Semilux International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES quarterly revenues of --. Semilux International's net income of -- is lower than ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's net income of --. Notably, Semilux International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES's PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Semilux International is -- versus 0.99x for ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SemiLEDs has a net margin of -- compared to Semilux International's net margin of -43.38%. Semilux International's return on equity of -- beat SemiLEDs's return on equity of -95.1%.

Semilux International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SemiLEDs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Semilux International has higher upside potential than SemiLEDs, analysts believe Semilux International is more attractive than SemiLEDs.

Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SemiLEDs has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.354%.

Semilux International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SemiLEDs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Semilux International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SemiLEDs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Semilux International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SemiLEDs quarterly revenues of $1.3M. Semilux International's net income of -- is lower than SemiLEDs's net income of -$547K. Notably, Semilux International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SemiLEDs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Semilux International is -- versus 2.32x for SemiLEDs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect has a net margin of -- compared to Semilux International's net margin of 15.7%. Semilux International's return on equity of -- beat Perfect's return on equity of 3.53%.

Semilux International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perfect has an analysts' consensus of $3.84 which suggests that it could grow by 48.17%. Given that Perfect has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Perfect is more attractive than Semilux International.

Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Semilux International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Semilux International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Semilux International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perfect quarterly revenues of $16.1M. Semilux International's net income of -- is lower than Perfect's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Semilux International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect's PE ratio is 43.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Semilux International is -- versus 4.65x for Perfect. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.