PUBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -26.62%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.09%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than Castellum.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 438.042%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.90x versus 1.30x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 8.91%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of --.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.09%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $45.46 which suggests that it could grow by 33.05%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than DigitalOcean Holdings, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than DigitalOcean Holdings.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are smaller than DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues of $204.9M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is lower than DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $18.3M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while DigitalOcean Holdings's PE ratio is 39.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.90x versus 4.19x for DigitalOcean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of --. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.09%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.69%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.90x versus 9.66x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Trade Desk has a net margin of 16.26% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 24.59%. PubMatic's return on equity of 4.44% beat The Trade Desk's return on equity of 15.96%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $16.38, signalling upside risk potential of 73.09%. On the other hand The Trade Desk has an analysts' consensus of $109.58 which suggests that it could grow by 91.37%. Given that The Trade Desk has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe The Trade Desk is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Trade Desk has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.516%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Trade Desk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Trade Desk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $85.5M, which are smaller than The Trade Desk quarterly revenues of $741M. PubMatic's net income of $13.9M is lower than The Trade Desk's net income of $182.2M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.26x while The Trade Desk's PE ratio is 73.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 1.90x versus 11.76x for The Trade Desk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.