PPTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Critical Metals has a net margin of -- compared to Perpetua Resources's net margin of --. Perpetua Resources's return on equity of -- beat Critical Metals's return on equity of --.

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 44.26%. On the other hand Critical Metals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perpetua Resources has higher upside potential than Critical Metals, analysts believe Perpetua Resources is more attractive than Critical Metals.

Perpetua Resources has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Critical Metals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perpetua Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Critical Metals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perpetua Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Critical Metals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perpetua Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Critical Metals quarterly revenues of --. Perpetua Resources's net income of -$4.3M is higher than Critical Metals's net income of --. Notably, Perpetua Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Critical Metals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perpetua Resources is -- versus -- for Critical Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hecla Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Perpetua Resources's net margin of 11.05%. Perpetua Resources's return on equity of -- beat Hecla Mining's return on equity of 3.49%.

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 44.26%. On the other hand Hecla Mining has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.44%. Given that Perpetua Resources has higher upside potential than Hecla Mining, analysts believe Perpetua Resources is more attractive than Hecla Mining.

Perpetua Resources has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hecla Mining has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.093%.

Perpetua Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hecla Mining offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perpetua Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hecla Mining pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Hecla Mining's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perpetua Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hecla Mining quarterly revenues of $261.3M. Perpetua Resources's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Hecla Mining's net income of $28.9M. Notably, Perpetua Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hecla Mining's PE ratio is 43.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perpetua Resources is -- versus 3.06x for Hecla Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Odyssey Marine Exploration has a net margin of -- compared to Perpetua Resources's net margin of -708.42%. Perpetua Resources's return on equity of -- beat Odyssey Marine Exploration's return on equity of --.

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 44.26%. On the other hand Odyssey Marine Exploration has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 575.68%. Given that Odyssey Marine Exploration has higher upside potential than Perpetua Resources, analysts believe Odyssey Marine Exploration is more attractive than Perpetua Resources.

Perpetua Resources has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Odyssey Marine Exploration has a beta of -0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.708%.

Perpetua Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Odyssey Marine Exploration offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perpetua Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Odyssey Marine Exploration pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perpetua Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Odyssey Marine Exploration quarterly revenues of $213.9K. Perpetua Resources's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Odyssey Marine Exploration's net income of $18.7M. Notably, Perpetua Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Odyssey Marine Exploration's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perpetua Resources is -- versus 39.03x for Odyssey Marine Exploration. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Impact has a net margin of -- compared to Perpetua Resources's net margin of -226.57%. Perpetua Resources's return on equity of -- beat Range Impact's return on equity of -99.35%.

Perpetua Resources has a consensus price target of $21.25, signalling upside risk potential of 44.26%. On the other hand Range Impact has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5094.81%. Given that Range Impact has higher upside potential than Perpetua Resources, analysts believe Range Impact is more attractive than Perpetua Resources.

Perpetua Resources has a beta of 0.722, which suggesting that the stock is 27.755% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Impact has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.633%.

Perpetua Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Range Impact offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perpetua Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Range Impact pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perpetua Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Range Impact quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Perpetua Resources's net income of -$4.3M is higher than Range Impact's net income of -$4.9M. Notably, Perpetua Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Range Impact's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perpetua Resources is -- versus 2.32x for Range Impact. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.